Morpho (MORPHO) is an efficient Ethereum-based protocol revolutionizing decentralized lending with customizable peer-to-peer and pool-based solutions.

Liquidity pools have revolutionized decentralized lending and borrowing by offering a wide choice of product options and significant liquidity levels. For several years, protocols like 

 (COMP) have been lauded as true innovators that introduced a real game-changer: pool-based lending and borrowing. However, a closer look reveals that things aren’t as efficient and smooth as they may seem within the world of crypto lending. The problem is that lending pools on decentralized protocols often have mismatches between lenders and borrowers, with the former substantially outnumbering the latter. As a result, lenders earn only meager 

s, while borrowers pay exorbitant fees to access funds via these pools. Another critical problem is the lack of customizability in lending and borrowing products, with many protocols adopting a one-size-fits-all approach.

Morpho (MORPHO) is a decentralized protocol on 

 (ETH) that aims to improve the efficiency and flexibility of crypto lending and borrowing by offering a unique model that combines the elements of 

 (P2P) and pool-based matching of lenders and borrowers. To be precise, one of Morpho's essential products, Morpho Optimizers, specifically focuses on P2P matching, with pool-based lending and borrowing used as a fallback option. Morpho also offers users an excellent level of customization for creating new lending markets through its core protocol.

With its innovative lender-borrower matching mechanism and highly customizable and flexible markets, Morpho greatly improves capital allocation and transaction efficiency in the 

 (MORPHO) is an Ethereum-based decentralized lending protocol that offers a unique P2P order matching mechanism to improve the efficiency and affordability of 

 The platform also enables users to create efficient lending markets with highly customizable lending and borrowing parameters. Additionally, it offers a product, Morpho Vaults, for curated lending at varying risk levels.

, a France-based software development company founded in 2021 by Merlin Egalité and Paul Frambot. It's also supported by the nonprofit 

As its first major product, the project launched Morpho Optimizers on the Ethereum blockchain in 2022. Morpho Optimizers is designed as an add-on solution for lending pools on Aave and Compound to help match individual lenders and borrowers. The transacting parties can benefit from a more efficient lending process than with the default pool-based mode.

In January 2024, the project launched Morpho Blue, later rebranded to Morpho, a solution to help users create highly flexible lending markets with custom parameters and options. Morpho acts as the backbone of the Morpho ecosystem, and the project team has turned its focus to promoting and further developing this product. At the same time, Morpho Optimizers remains an integral part of the platform's core offering, albeit in a less prioritized state than Morpho.

The Morpho protocol consists of three main products — Morpho, Morpho Vaults (based on the underlying protocol) and the legacy Morpho Optimizers. Morpho allows users to create individual lending markets by specifying their preferred options for the following key attributes:

All these parameters are highly customizable, with minimal interference from the Morpho governance mechanism. Some parameters do have to conform to certain requirements; e.g., the IRM and LLTV must be from the list approved by the protocol's governance.

Morpho's high level of customizability is a significant departure from the typical model used on decentralized lending and borrowing platforms. On most other protocols, there are fixed parameters governing the lending and borrowing process; e.g., only certain collateral assets, lending assets or LLTV rates are allowed. In contrast, Morpho lets you customize all of these options, giving lending market creators an unmatched degree of freedom. The protocol offers the following key benefits to users, developers and market operators:

While Morpho is currently the platform's flagship product, the legacy Morpho Optimizers continues as a key offering in the platform's product line. Morpho Optimizers are add-on layers to the Aave and Compound lending pools. They can be used to facilitate a peer-to-peer match between lenders and borrowers. Since typical lending pools — including on platforms like Aave and Compound — are often heavily skewed with more lenders than borrowers, both parties end up paying excessive fees. Borrowers have to confront high costs due to the need to service the many lenders in the pool. In turn, lenders fight for the meager scraps left over from insufficient numbers of borrowers.

By using a P2P matching mechanism, Morpho Optimizers effectively takes the lender and borrower away from pool-based interaction and establishes a direct relationship between them. This allows users to borrow assets at cheaper rates, while also delivering better APYs for lenders. If either party withdraws from the direct lending relationship, both parties have the option to use the standard lending pools on Aave and Compound as a fallback.

The platform's third core product, Morpho Vaults (covered in more detail below) utilizes the underlying protocol and provides a way to lend through carefully curated market options at different risk profiles. This can suit lenders who are less proficient in using fully customized markets, but still prefer to take advantage of the lending opportunities offered by Morpho.

In order to create a custom lending market on Morpho, you need to have some technical proficiency and, preferably, knowledge of Solidity, the programming language that the protocol uses for its smart contracts. As noted earlier, developers can create a custom market by supplying five base parameters — a collateral asset, an asset offered for lending, an oracle, a preferred IRM and an LLTV. The first four of these normally require an Ethereum smart contract address to be specified. For the collateral and lending assets, these are the addresses for the tokens' contracts. The selected oracle is also usually established via a pointer to its smart contract address, although oracle-less hard-coded prices for the collateral and lent assets are acceptable. Morpho also maintains Ethereum addresses for each IRM whitelisted by the protocol's governance; developers can use these when choosing a preferred IRM.

The last value, LLTV, is a hard-coded figure that defines the threshold beyond which a loan becomes unhealthy due to its poor 

. Liquidators on Morpho are protocol actors who are incentivized to cover bad debts in return for collateral, similar to the method used on many other lending platforms. They’re allowed to liquidate up to 100% of the debt. In return, liquidators receive the debt's collateral, as well as an additional incentive for their work.

Since Morpho is an oracle-agnostic protocol without a built-in oracle, each market can have its own oracle that sources prices for the collateral and lending assets from external sources. Developers are completely free in that regard, and can even hard-code asset prices for the market if they don't wish to use a price oracle at all. Naturally, an oracle is preferred for maintaining the most up-to-date and dynamic pricing information.

The IRM used is the only base parameter with which developers are somewhat restricted in their choice, as only whitelisted IRMs are allowed for a market. As of mid-November 2024, there’s just one whitelisted IRM that market creators can specify — the 

. This model dynamically adjusts interest rates to maintain the proportion of borrowed funds to supplied funds at close to 90%.

Morpho Vaults are a tokenized vault product that offers curated lending opportunities with varying pre-programmed risk parameters. Each vault is associated with a single loan asset, and can allocate deposits across multiple Morpho markets, thereby leveraging the overall liquidity available on the Morpho protocol. Morpho Vaults suit lenders who prefer predictable risk management over the uncertainty of completely custom markets. Each lender can earn APY rates commensurate with their chosen 

There is no limit on the number of vaults you can open on Morpho. Thus, you might even allocate funds to different vaults with significantly different risk levels to diversify your exposure.

Morpho Vaults' curated nature eliminates the need for users to spend time researching and evaluating individual markets' risk levels and return opportunities, as risk exposure is actively managed by the vault.

Since the vaults are connected to the underlying protocol, and source liquidity from it, they’re dynamically rebalanced, which helps optimize yields. Thanks to their permissionless and immutable nature, the vaults are also completely transparent. Moreover, they’re noncustodial, granting users full control over their deposited assets, which can be withdrawn at any time.

A lender deposits an asset into a Morpho Vault and receives shares of the vault as confirmation of their investment. The vaults themselves are tokenized products utilizing Ethereum's 

 standard, designed to represent tokenized vaults for yield-bearing assets. Each vault may be owned by a 

 (DAO), an individual DeFi expert or some algorithm maintained by a DeFi platform. A vault can be owned by only one entity. The owner may specify additional roles/entities for managing the vault. These roles can include one curator, one guardian and multiple allocators.

The curator is a party who sets certain limits, rules and boundaries for the vault, such as specifying asset supply limitations and enabling/disabling specific markets. Curators are instrumental in maintaining appropriate risk levels for their vaults. Assets that lenders lock in a vault are supplied to the protocol's underlying markets, based on curators' whitelists. There can only be one curator for each vault.

The role of guardian is a key vault position. A guardian protects the integrity and security of the vault. Guardians can revoke any action by the vault owner (or other entities) if they consider it to be against the interests of vault lenders. Each vault can only have one guardian, typically a DAO consisting of vault depositors.

Allocators are protocol actors whose job is to rebalance the liquidity utilized by Morpho Vaults to optimize interest rates and accessible liquidity. An allocator’s job is to rebalance and optimize the total liquidity, either manually or using bots, to best meet the needs of Morpho borrowers.

Morpho Vaults' operations aren't regulated by the protocol's governance mechanism. Each vault owner is responsible for their vault's governance model. Specific roles, such as the curator and the guardian, are designed to help in establishing transparent and secure governance procedures for a vault.

What Is the Morpho Crypto Token (MORPHO)?

The platform's native cryptocurrency, MORPHO, is envisioned as a 

. Holders of MORPHO have the right to participate in decision-making on the platform's future direction, general rules, deployment of smart contracts and allocation of funds from the treasury. Although Morpho promotes lending and borrowing markets that operate with minimal interference from the protocol's governance community, there are some general guidelines and rules through which the community needs to establish certain standards, minimum requirements or whitelists. MORPHO token holders are instrumental in this process.

The original MORHPO token was launched on Ethereum in June 2022 with a supply cap of 1 billion. However, there were limitations to the original token contract that negatively affected its functionality. Specifically, the token wasn't designed to facilitate efficient on-chain voting. As a result of these limitations, the project decided to relaunch the token, now on an upgraded contract. The new reincarnation of MORPHO will offer better functional capabilities, including more efficient on-chain governance processes. 

As of the time of writing on Nov 17, 2024, the project team has yet to deploy the new token. The new MORPHO will also be a supply-capped crypto, with a maximum and total supply of 1 billion. The token's supply distribution shares are shown in the chart below.

 token before its market launch. Bybit Pre-Market Trading is an over-the-counter (OTC) trading platform that provides access to promising new cryptocurrencies before their listings on the Spot market. The key advantage of the platform is the ability to access cryptocurrencies at desirable rates before the broader crypto market affects their prices.

Bybit's carefully designed curation process ensures that only crypto assets with solid potential and fundamentals are whitelisted for Pre-Market Trading. This saves you the time required to investigate each cryptocurrency, and reduces the risk of investing in scam projects. Naturally, you’re also encouraged to 

 on crypto assets you might consider purchasing through Bybit Pre-Market Trading.

Morpho represents a unique and potentially highly effective approach to DeFi lending and borrowing. The platform's facilitation of isolated and highly customizable lending markets gives DeFi users unmatched freedom in terms of choice and variety. In addition, users who prefer the stability of curated and well-defined risk profiles can take advantage of Morpho Vaults for more predictable yields. The use of the overall underlying protocol liquidity along with entities such as allocators makes Morpho Vaults particularly effective at optimizing lending and borrowing costs.

While custom lending markets launched via the protocol are now Morpho's key focus, the legacy Morpho Optimizers also continue to offer value. P2P matching of lenders and borrowers as an add-on to the standard pool-based mechanism is a functionality many DeFi users will find helpful. Morpho Optimizers can offer lenders and borrowers active on Aave and Compound an alternative and highly effective way of conducting their operations.

With this arsenal of innovative and unique products, the Morpho protocol is quickly shaping up as a leading platform in the lending niche of the DeFi industry.

Advanced

morpho crypto.png

Morpho (MORPHO): Leading Efficient, Permissionless Crypto Lending

Puff is a meme coin with a dragon-based theme. It uses a gamified mechanic for distribution and is based on the Ethereum blockchain. Learn more here.

 are designed solely for entertainment, so they can have a lot of unusual and creative features. One example of the interesting applications of meme coins is Puff. This fun coin aims to attract users by adding elements of story and gamification to its design. If you're interested in learning about Puff and seeing why it's so popular lately, check out this guide.

 is a meme coin with a dragon-based theme. It uses a gamified mechanic for distribution and is based on the 

 blockchain. It encourages users to engage in its ecosystem by following along with Puff the Dragon's storyline.

mETHLab is an Ethereum-based lending and borrowing protocol. It's fixed-term and fixed-rate, with no forced 

 of collateral. Users can supply PUFF or mETH tokens and borrow mETH or USDe against these tokens.

 for the mETH Protocol. Users who hold mETH or participate in certain parts of the Puff the Dragon ecosystem can acquire points that will be converted to COOK. People can also acquire COOK by burning PUFF.

Puff aims to attract users with a novel approach to meme coins and lending. Its ecosystem takes the trending 

 ideas of gamification and storytelling and applies them to its products. For example, instead of simply borrowing on the mETHLab protocol, users are encouraged to "cook with Puff the Dragon in the mETHLab." The creators hope this adds a little extra fun and enjoyment that makes people more interested in working with their system.

As the dragon's origin story explains, Puff is also attempting to combine two opposing viewpoints into its ecosystem. Puff the Dragon is a "black and gold dragon" that is part chaos and part lawful order. Similarly, Puff's ecosystem tries to combine the regulation of 

. Unlike other ecosystems that either “play it safe” or focus on experimentation, Puff hopes to combine the two concepts into one system.

 network. All of its features are run through Ethereum’s system, so the project is reliable and secure. However, its secondary layer operates parallel to the main network, so it’s more scalable and features lower fees than Ethereum’s. The full ecosystem is accessible through the project's online website. This helpful interface guides people through staking, borrowing and lending Puff's digital assets in a fun, gamified manner. Unlike with traditional exchanges, the videos, cartoon assets and entertaining visuals are used to create a gamelike, fantasy feel.

The Puff the Dragon project offers far more than just a single, tradeable meme coin. Once you get involved in its ecosystem, you can access all of these exciting features.

The Puff Penthouse is where fans of Puff the Dragon can interact with the whole ecosystem. Users can stake and burn PUFF tokens, or send tokens to the mETHLab through this interface. It features many adorable and intriguing pieces of 3D art that add to the Puff lore.

 within the Puff the Dragon ecosystem. Each NFT features an individualized rendition of the project's dragon. There are currently 8,888 NFTs, ranked according to rarity. The rarest level, Legendary Puff Dragons, has 388 different variations.

Mystic Potions are another set of NFTs within the ecosystem. They come in red, green, blue and other colors, and can be used to mint Puff NFTs. There are 8,888 Mystic Potions, each one a 

. Only original ecosystem users are able to receive a Mystic Potion, but if desired, they can convert it to a Puff NFT and sell it.

PUFF is the main token of the Puff the Dragon ecosystem. In addition to trading like a standard meme coin, it can also be used for staking and lending. PUFF has a total supply of 888.888888 million tokens, 

 are indefinitely locked. Tokens will be distributed as follows:

The PUFF token has undergone plenty of price fluctuation since it was released. Shortly after its launch in April 2024, the coin shot up to an 

. However, as user interest waned, its price dropped to an ATL of $0.03 in September 2024. Nevertheless, there’s still a lot of interest in trading the token. Its price is back up to $0.0947 as of Nov 18, 2024, and many traders are bullish.

Analysis of market conditions from DigitalCoinPrice suggests a slightly different story: a small price decrease of around 2% to 5% in the upcoming weeks before rising in value as 2025 approaches. According to DigitalCoinPrice, by 2025 Puff 

, and by 2030 the token may be worth up to $0.54.

Looking to trade Puff tokens? Bybit now offers the PUFF/USDT Spot trading pair. To get started, you’ll first need to create a Bybit account, then fund it with cryptocurrency and navigate to the 

PUFF is an exciting project that's gotten a lot of interest recently. Thanks to its charming story and blend of helpful features, PUFF has done a great job of maintaining user engagement. The coin's trading volume is also fairly stable. This is a token worth investing in if you enjoy seeking out underrated yet promising meme coins.

 toward Puff the Dragon's design. Some feel that the coin's tokenomics and general structure keep it from being a true meme coin. Instead, they suggest that the coin is operating more like a web3 yield-farming system, but is using the meme coin label to get away with lax regulation and an imprecise road map. This doesn't necessarily mean the coin is doomed to failure, but it does mean you might want to look at it more critically than you might regard other meme coins. Since volatility is inevitable, it's essential to use 

 strategies such as portfolio divestment before buying PUFF.

Puff (PUFF) is an intriguing model of a meme coin that uses features besides memes to attract users. By creating a gamified staking and lending mechanism, Puff hopes to capture users' attention and get them invested in its dragon-themed storyline. Though this project still needs to prove that it can attract more fans, it's on the way to generating significant levels of interest. 

Intermediate

puff crypto.png

Puff (PUFF): Entering the Magical Realm of Puff the Dragon

As Bitcoin's dominance persists, emerging regulatory clarity may catalyze a resurgence in altcoins, particularly for platforms like Ethereum and Solana, which are poised to benefit from a pro-crypto environment.

: Donald Trump’s election signals a pivotal shift in cryptocurrency policy, moving from skepticism to advocacy, which may redefine the regulatory landscape.

: The election result triggered immediate and substantial reactions in the crypto markets, particularly evident in Bitcoin's price surge, reflecting heightened investor optimism.

: A Republican-controlled U.S. Congress could lead to clearer and more favorable regulations for digital assets, fostering innovation and investment in the sector.

: As Bitcoin's dominance persists, emerging regulatory clarity may catalyze a resurgence in altcoins, particularly for platforms like Ethereum and Solana, which are poised to benefit from a pro-crypto environment.

Donald Trump’s re-emergence as the “crypto president” represents a dramatic turnaround in his relationship with the cryptocurrency sector. Once a vocal critic, his 2024 campaign embraced Bitcoin, positioning it as central to his economic strategy. This transformation can be attributed to the substantial financial contributions from crypto firms, which played a crucial role in his campaign, underscoring the industry's growing political influence. By vowing to make America the “crypto capital of the planet,” Trump not only appeals to a burgeoning voter base invested in digital assets, but also aligns himself with the interests of powerful crypto stakeholders. This shift could fundamentally alter the regulatory framework governing cryptocurrencies, potentially easing restrictions and fostering an environment more conducive to innovation.

The immediate aftermath of Trump’s victory was characterized by significant volatility in the crypto markets, particularly with Bitcoin (BTC) experiencing a sharp rally from approximately $70K to nearly $90K. This movement was not merely speculative; it reflected a broader alignment of market sentiment with political outcomes. The use of on-chain prediction markets such as Polymarket illustrated how traders adjusted their positions in real time based on election developments. As Trump's victory appeared more likely, BTC’s correlation with these prediction markets intensified, showcasing a direct link between political events and crypto valuations. This responsiveness highlights the increasing intertwining of traditional financial markets with crypto as investors seek to leverage political insights to inform their trading strategies.

Regulatory Outlook and Congressional Influence

With a Republican majority in both chambers of the U.S. Congress, the potential for significant regulatory reforms in the cryptocurrency space is heightened. Historical context reveals that previous efforts, such as the FIT21 Act, aimed to delineate the regulatory authority over digital assets, although it faced challenges in legislative passage. However, the current political landscape, coupled with substantial financial backing from crypto-friendly Super PACs, sets the stage for a more favorable regulatory environment. The election cycle demonstrated the effectiveness of targeted political spending in reshaping legislative priorities, particularly in key Senate races. 

As newly elected officials take office, their pro-crypto stances could lead to expedited discussions and potential passage of critical regulatory frameworks, thereby reducing ambiguity and fostering a more robust investment climate.

While Bitcoin continues to dominate the market narrative, the potential for altcoins to gain traction is significant, especially in light of a supportive regulatory environment. Historical patterns suggest that Bitcoin's dominance often peaks during bull markets, followed by a capital rotation into altcoins as investors seek higher returns. The recent surge in Bitcoin's price has overshadowed altcoins, and yet the incoming administration's pro-crypto posture may catalyze renewed interest in platforms like Ethereum and Solana. These networks, which facilitate smart contracts and decentralized finance (DeFi) applications, stand to benefit from increased investment as regulatory clarity emerges. The influx of capital into altcoin markets could be accelerated by the anticipated legislative focus on fostering innovation within the cryptocurrency sector, marking a potential shift in market dynamics as investors diversify their portfolios beyond Bitcoin.

In conclusion, Trump's presidency heralds a transformative period for the cryptocurrency landscape, characterized by potential regulatory clarity and increased market participation. As the political and financial realms converge, stakeholders in the crypto ecosystem must remain attuned to the evolving landscape, ready to adapt to new opportunities and challenges that arise in this dynamic environment.

NOV24_R34_BlockScholes banner 1600x900.png

Bybit x Block Scholes Institution Report: Takeaways From the U.S. Election and What to Look For Next

Nansen has partnered with TRON DAO to integrate the TRON network into Nansen V2, enhancing on-chain analytics for the TRON ecosystem. 

Daily Top Performer — Virtuals Protocol (VIRTUAL)

The S&P 500 climbed 0.4%, driven by a nearly 5% surge in Nvidia shares ahead of its highly anticipated earnings report, which lifted market sentiment despite ongoing geopolitical concerns.  Coindesk Indices, an index measuring broader cryptocurrency market performance was up by 0.15%, with Bitcoin rising by 1.13% and Ether dropping by 1.62%, in the past 24 hours.

Today's top performer is VIRTUAL, which surged 5.2% after the launch of Agentstarter, empowering founders to build successful AI agents with Virtuals Protocol.

Virtuals Protocol (VIRTUAL), founded in 2021, allows users to invest in and co-own AI-driven virtual assets like companions and influencers. Its model fosters community ownership, transforming AI agents into revenue-generating assets across platforms like Roblox and TikTok. The platform attracts contributors from AI and gaming to drive innovation in virtual economies. Virtuals Protocol introduces 

, an AI agent launchpad offering funding, development support, and distribution for creators. It aims to help founders build successful AI agents within a thriving ecosystem and long-term incentive structure.

Check Out the Latest Prices, Charts, and Data of 

 to integrate the TRON network into Nansen V2, enhancing on-chain analytics for the TRON ecosystem. This collaboration aims to provide developers, users, and projects with valuable data to foster growth and innovation. The integration will offer advanced features like Token God Mode, Wallet Profiler, and Smart Alerts, helping optimize decentralized applications (DApps) and improve transparency within the community. TRON’s high-speed, low-cost blockchain infrastructure will benefit from these enhanced analytics to further empower the ecosystem.

Yesterday, total inflows into BTC Spot ETFs amounted to $600.3 million, with $16.2 million coming from GBTC and $584.1 million from non-GBTC sources.

 allows users to earn XP for transactions, quests, gas fees, and referrals in its wallet. XP, while offchain, is tied to wallet addresses and used to level up and unlock exclusive rewards. Key features include free transactions on the ZERϴ Network, daily quests, and retroactive XP for active wallets before mid-October. Rewards enhance the onchain experience but are non-transferable. The program encourages bridging assets to ZERϴ and active participation to maximize XP and rewards.

Beginner

4.png

Nansen Partners with TRON DAO to Enhance On-Chain Analytics for TRON Ecosystem

Bybit Learn

Investing

Staking

Like the idea of passive income? Read on as we compare yield farming vs. staking so you understand which is strategy is best for you.

As major cryptocurrencies have flirted with all-time highs this year, investors have looked toward passive income strategies as opposed to active trading. Sone example of such strategies include debating between the merits of yield farming vs. staking. Spurred in part by low interest rates in other markets, and in reaction to the risks of active trading, yield farming and staking are becoming more popular as ways to reward investors when they HODL their favorite tokens and coins.

Not satisfied with just storing their digital assets and hoping that the value will appreciate, investors have found ways to put their crypto to work. Of all the various ways of earning passive income on your crypto assets, yield farming and staking are taking center stage. Between the two strategies, which one will work best for you?

In this article, we’ll look at yield farming vs. staking in order to better understand how they work, their associated risks and benefits, and which strategy could better fit your goals.

 is a method of generating cryptocurrency from your crypto holdings. It has drawn analogies to farming because it’s an innovative way to “grow your own cryptocurrency.” The process involves lending crypto assets for interest to 

 platforms, who lock them up in a liquidity pool, essentially a smart contract for holding funds.

The funds locked in the liquidity pool provide liquidity to a DeFi protocol, where they’re used to facilitate trading, lending and borrowing. By providing liquidity, the platform earns fees that are paid out to investors according to their share of the liquidity pool. Yield farming is also known as liquidity mining.

Liquidity pools are essential for AMMs, or automated market makers. 

 offer permissionless and automated trading using liquidity pools instead of a traditional system of sellers and buyers. Liquidity provider tokens, or LP tokens, are issued to liquidity providers to track their individual contributions to the liquidity pool. 

For example, if a trader wants to exchange 

 (DAI), they pay a fee. This fee is paid to the liquidity providers in proportion to the amount of liquidity they add to the pool. The more capital provided to the liquidity pool, the higher the rewards.

As a yield farmer, you might lend digital assets such as Dai through a 

, such as Compound (COMP), which then lends coins to borrowers. Interest rates change depending on how high demand is. The interest earned accrues daily, and you get paid in new COMP coins, which can also appreciate in value. Compound (COMP) and Aave (AAVE) are a couple of the most popular DeFi protocols for yield farming which have helped popularize this section of the DeFi market.

Instead of just having your cryptocurrency stored in a wallet, you can effectively earn more crypto by yield farming. Yield farmers can earn from transaction fees, token rewards, interest, and price appreciation. Yield farming is also an inexpensive alternative to mining — since you don’t have to purchase expensive mining equipment or pay for electricity. 

More sophisticated yield farming strategies can be executed using smart contracts, or by depositing a few different tokens onto a crypto platform. A yield farming protocol typically focuses on maximizing returns, while at the same time taking liquidity and security into consideration.

 is the process of supporting a blockchain network and participating in transaction validation by committing your crypto assets to that network. It’s used by blockchain networks which use the 

 (PoS) consensus mechanism. Investors earn interest on their investments while they wait for block rewards to be released.

PoS blockchains are less energy intensive than proof of work (PoW) blockchains, such as Bitcoin, because unlike PoW networks, they don’t require massive computing power to validate new blocks. Instead, nodes — servers that process transactions — on a PoS blockchain are used to validate transactions and act as checkpoints. “Validators” are users on the network who set up nodes, are randomly chosen to sign blocks, and receive rewards for doing so. 

You might not even have to understand the technicalities of setting up a node, because crypto exchanges often allow investors to provide their crypto assets, and then the network handles the node setup and validation process. For instance, brokerages such as Binance, Coinbase and Kraken offer this service. Kraken reported in January that its customers already have more than $1 billion worth of crypto assets staked on the platform.

Since PoS consensus is based on ownership, it requires an initial setup to distribute coins fairly among the validators in order for the protocol to work correctly. This can be done through a trusted source, or via proof of burn. Once the staking has started up, and all nodes are synced with the blockchain, proof of stake becomes secure and fully decentralized.

Staking ensures a blockchain network is secure against attacks. The more stakes that are on a blockchain network, the more decentralized and secure it will be. Since stakers are rewarded for maintaining the integrity of the network, it’s possible for them to earn higher returns than those who invest in other financial markets. However, there are also risks involved in staking, since the stability of networks may fluctuate over time.

, which is an umbrella term for financial applications using blockchain networks to obviate the use of intermediaries in transactions.

For example, if you take out a bank loan now, the bank acts as an intermediary by issuing a loan. DeFi aims to remove the need to rely on such an intermediary through the use of smart contracts, which are essentially computer code that executes based on predetermined conditions. The overall goal is to reduce costs and transaction fees associated with financial products like lending, borrowing and saving. 

When it comes to staking, there are a few extra measures investors should take into account, as they’re engaging in DeFi. These include:

DeFi platforms are often more secure than traditional finance applications because they’re decentralized — and therefore less susceptible to security breaches. You can stake tokens with a variety of already established projects, such as 

. Ethereum is also transitioning from PoW to PoS validation, which means network transactions will be entirely confirmed by staking.

Yield Farming vs. Staking: What’s the Difference?

Curious about which is better suited for the average investor when deciding between yield farming vs. staking? Yield farming is very similar to staking because both require holding some amount of crypto assets to generate profits. 

Some investors consider staking to be a part of yield farming. While the terms “yield farming” and “staking” are sometimes used interchangeably, there are distinct ways in which they differ. Here are the key differences.

When looking at yield farming vs. staking, staking is often the simpler strategy for earning passive income, because investors simply decide on the staking pool and then lock in their crypto. Yield farming, on the other hand, can require a bit of work — as investors choose which tokens to lend and on which platform, with the possibility of continuously switching platforms or tokens.

Providing liquidity as a yield farmer on a 

) may require depositing a pair of coins in sufficient quantities. These can range from niche altcoins to high volume stablecoins. Rewards are then paid based on the amount of liquidity deposited. It often pays well to switch between yield farming pools constantly, though this also requires paying additional gas fees. As a result, yield farming can benefit more than staking from active management. This is how the top yield farmers go about achieving the highest possible returns. 

Ultimately, yield farming is more complex than staking — but it may also yield higher returns if you have the time, wherewithal and know-how to manage it.

Yield farming is often practiced on newly created DeFi projects, which can be highly risky if “rug pulls” occur. This term refers to shady developers intentionally draining assets from liquidity pools.

Even smart contracts built by high-quality developers can have weaknesses or bugs, which is always a risk. According to a survey, 

 don’t know how to read smart contracts — and don’t understand the associated risks.

Staking can be done with minimal initial investment, which can make staking an attractive option for users who are new to DeFi. Rug pulls are also less likely on an established PoS network.

Volatility risk is common to both yield farming and staking. Yield farmers and stakers alike can lose money when tokens suddenly drop in value. Liquidation risk also occurs when your collateral is no longer enough to cover your investment.

While yield farming offers a better yield than staking, risk-averse investors might be more inclined to consider staking when weighing yield farming vs. staking strategies. The risks can be higher since transaction fees can add up and detract from returns. The risk of asset depreciation applies to both strategies: you can lose your money if the market turns unexpectedly bearish. 

 due to fluctuations in prices from when the crypto was initially deposited. For example, if you deposit funds into a liquidity pool and then that crypto spikes in value, you would have been better off holding those tokens — rather than depositing them into the pool. You can also experience this loss if the crypto that you’re holding drops in value. Conversely, impermanent loss does not apply to staking.

Wherever there’s a risk, there can also be a reward. Just as jumping off the Eiffel Tower for that adrenaline rush might not be a good trade-off — at least, not without a parachute and a good lawyer — weighing risk and reward in financial investments is critical.

The main comparison for yield farming vs. staking is the passive income investors can gain from staying invested. The more returns received, the more that can be reinvested and grown. Albert Einstein once called compound interest the “eighth wonder of the world” because of the potential for outsized gains from this phenomenon. 

, or APY. Traditional staking on exchanges tends to have steadier APY returns when compared to yield farming. Typically, staking rewards are in the range of 5%–14%.

For example, yield farmers who get involved early with a new project or strategy can reap sizable profits. Returns can range from 1% to 1,000% APY, according to 

. However, these strategies bear higher risk. 

For investors seeking liquidity when comparing yield farming vs. staking, the winning strategy is clear. Staking offers increased returns (or APY) when investors choose to lock in their funds for prolonged periods. Yield farming, however, doesn’t require investors to lock in their funds.

PoS tokens are inflationary assets, and any yield paid to stakers is made up of new token supply. By staking your tokens, you can at least receive rewards in line with inflation, proportional to the amount staked. If you miss out on staking, the value of your existing holdings decreases — from inflation. 

For the unaware comparing yield farming vs. staking, gas fees can certainly be a significant concern for yield farmers who are free to switch between liquidity pools, but have to pay transaction fees in the process. Yield farmers need to factor in any switching costs, even if they spot a higher return on another platform.

Stakers on a network don’t have to solve computationally difficult math problems to mine rewards, as they would in a PoW blockchain network. Hence, the costs of staking upfront and maintenance are also lower.

Yield farming based on newer DeFi protocols may be more vulnerable to hackers, especially if there are glitches in a smart contract’s programming. Staking is generally more secure because stakers are participating in the underlying blockchain’s strict consensus method. Any attempt to trick the system may actually result in the perpetrators losing their staked funds.

Yield Farming vs. Staking: Which Is the Better Short-Term Investment?

For investors with a shorter time horizon and are stuck in deciding between yield farming vs. staking, both strategies have their own unique benefits.

Staking allows investors to generate rewards immediately during transaction validation. As a result, it can be a good short-term investment which reaps steady profits. For example, a staking strategy can be used for mining a PoS coin like Cardano ADA. Staking ADA offers no additional risk beyond owning Cardano.

However, the expected return and risk may be lower than with an active yield farming strategy.

On the other hand, if you need liquidity for a short-term strategy, yield farming doesn’t require a lockup of funds. You can try to generate high returns on platforms offering a high APY. As with any investment strategy, execution matters — and a bit of luck helps, too.

Yield Farming vs. Staking: Which Is the Better Long-Term Investment?

You can also use yield farming and staking as longer-term strategies to earn more income from crypto.

First, let’s take a look at yield farming, which is basically reinvesting profits back into crypto to generate interest in the form of more crypto. While yield farming may not always offer an immediate return on investment (ROI), it  doesn’t require you to lock up your money, as staking does. 

Despite the lack of an immediate payout, yield farming has the potential to be fairly lucrative over the long term. Why? Because without a lockup, you can try to jump between platforms and tokens to find the best yield. You just need to trust the network and DApp you’re using. As such, yield farming could prove to be a great way to diversify your portfolio.

Staking can be a reliable source of returns over the long term as well, especially if you’re committed to HODLing and therefore plan to keep your coins for the long haul. Whether you decide to stake or yield farm over time may depend more on how actively you’d like to manage your investments. While staking returns could turn out to be less profitable, it trumps the yield farming vs. staking comparison because the associated long-term risks are fewer. This ultimately makes the returns more stable.

Overall, we hope this comparison for yield farming vs. staking has been useful for you. Staking and yield farming are still relatively new passive income strategies when compared to approaches used in other financial markets. At times, the terms are used interchangeably, and staking may even be considered a subset of yield farming. Both approaches to earning passive income rely on holding crypto assets to earn rewards, and each strategy allows investors to share in the value of the decentralized financial ecosystem.

Staking may be more of an intuitive concept to understand, whereas yield farming can require a bit of strategic maneuvering to reap higher profits. Both products offer rates of return that can be highly attractive. Deciding between yield farming and staking depends on your level of investor sophistication, and what’s right for your portfolio. 

Yield Farming vs. Staking: Which Passive Income Strategy Is Better?

Grab Up to 5,000 USDT in Rewards

Grab Up to 5,000 USDT in Rewards